<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53795</link>
    <description>Burnt copper wire scrap was held not chargeable to duty under Rule 57-S(2)(c) because it did not fall under any tariff heading and was not the result of a process of manufacture. As the statutory conditions for taxing waste and scrap were not met, the duty demand was found unsustainable. The order dropping the demand was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:19:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53795</link>
      <description>Burnt copper wire scrap was held not chargeable to duty under Rule 57-S(2)(c) because it did not fall under any tariff heading and was not the result of a process of manufacture. As the statutory conditions for taxing waste and scrap were not met, the duty demand was found unsustainable. The order dropping the demand was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>