<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471668</link>
    <description>Penalties for non-compliance with information notices during scrutiny may be limited where later notices substantially duplicate information sought earlier. Failure to comply led to an ex parte assessment, but the explanation for non-compliance supported treating only the first notice as an independent default. The penalty was therefore restricted to the first non-compliance, and penalties imposed for the substantially repetitive later notices were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471668</link>
      <description>Penalties for non-compliance with information notices during scrutiny may be limited where later notices substantially duplicate information sought earlier. Failure to comply led to an ex parte assessment, but the explanation for non-compliance supported treating only the first notice as an independent default. The penalty was therefore restricted to the first non-compliance, and penalties imposed for the substantially repetitive later notices were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>