https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53792 The appeals against the order confirming duty and imposing penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods were allowed. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate the claims, noting unreliable witness testimonies and inadmissible reports. The company's documentation effectively countered the allegations. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, granting consequential relief to all appellants. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53792 The appeals against the order confirming duty and imposing penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods were allowed. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate the claims, noting unreliable witness testimonies and inadmissible reports. The company's documentation effectively countered the allegations. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, granting consequential relief to all appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53792