<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 152 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53783</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the Modvat/Cenvat Rule change. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders, stating that there was no cause of action against the appellants as they had only taken credit of duty that was not payable but actually paid. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:56:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 152 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53783</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the Modvat/Cenvat Rule change. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders, stating that there was no cause of action against the appellants as they had only taken credit of duty that was not payable but actually paid. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>