https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471657 Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent lie from a single Judge's order under Section 622 of the Civil Procedure Code when the revisional order amounts to a judgment determining rights or interests. The majority treated revisional power as appellate in character because it reviews and corrects proceedings already decided by a subordinate court. Sections 588 and 591 did not restrict a Letters Patent appeal in those circumstances. The dissent distinguished revisional jurisdiction from appellate jurisdiction and considered statutory restrictions on appeals from orders applicable. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 1898 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471657 Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent lie from a single Judge's order under Section 622 of the Civil Procedure Code when the revisional order amounts to a judgment determining rights or interests. The majority treated revisional power as appellate in character because it reviews and corrects proceedings already decided by a subordinate court. Sections 588 and 591 did not restrict a Letters Patent appeal in those circumstances. The dissent distinguished revisional jurisdiction from appellate jurisdiction and considered statutory restrictions on appeals from orders applicable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Oct 1898 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471657