<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798794</link>
    <description>Central Excise liability for dolochar, fly ash, iron ore fines and similar residues requires manufacture or production; marketability, sale value and tariff classification alone are insufficient. Unavoidable coal residues and handling or screening fines do not become distinct commodities unless an independent process creates goods with a separate name, character or use. Where dolochar is treated as Chapter 26 waste from sponge-iron manufacture, an unconditional waste exemption applies, leaving no effective duty. An interpretational dispute, including divergent administrative views, does not establish fraud, suppression or intent to evade; extended limitation, interest and penalties therefore cannot apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798794</link>
      <description>Central Excise liability for dolochar, fly ash, iron ore fines and similar residues requires manufacture or production; marketability, sale value and tariff classification alone are insufficient. Unavoidable coal residues and handling or screening fines do not become distinct commodities unless an independent process creates goods with a separate name, character or use. Where dolochar is treated as Chapter 26 waste from sponge-iron manufacture, an unconditional waste exemption applies, leaving no effective duty. An interpretational dispute, including divergent administrative views, does not establish fraud, suppression or intent to evade; extended limitation, interest and penalties therefore cannot apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>