<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 840 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798814</link>
    <description>Interest expenditure on borrowings used for business purposes is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii), subject to the proviso restricting deduction until an acquired asset is first put to use. Open land used as a storage yard for bulky trading stock was supported by delivery, unloading, electricity and photographic evidence. Capital work-in-progress for an additional structure on part of the land did not negate business use of the remaining area. Where no borrowing or interest amount is directly attributable to incomplete construction, and capital plus interest-free loans sufficiently cover the land cost, the investment is presumed to be from interest-free funds. The interest disallowance was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 840 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798814</link>
      <description>Interest expenditure on borrowings used for business purposes is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii), subject to the proviso restricting deduction until an acquired asset is first put to use. Open land used as a storage yard for bulky trading stock was supported by delivery, unloading, electricity and photographic evidence. Capital work-in-progress for an additional structure on part of the land did not negate business use of the remaining area. Where no borrowing or interest amount is directly attributable to incomplete construction, and capital plus interest-free loans sufficiently cover the land cost, the investment is presumed to be from interest-free funds. The interest disallowance was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>