<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 843 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798817</link>
    <description>Section 68 treatment of an outstanding trade-creditor balance requires verification where purchases, corresponding sales and stock are accepted and additional evidence supports the creditor&#039;s identity and genuineness. Confirmation, ledgers, invoices, banking records, GST registration, tax returns, and evidence concerning destroyed records were admitted for fresh verification; no addition is to be made if the evidence is discrepancy-free. Tax deduction on purchases is not required twice where the seller has already collected tax at source before the buyer could deduct it. Consequently, disallowance for non-deduction of tax on those purchase payments cannot survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 843 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798817</link>
      <description>Section 68 treatment of an outstanding trade-creditor balance requires verification where purchases, corresponding sales and stock are accepted and additional evidence supports the creditor&#039;s identity and genuineness. Confirmation, ledgers, invoices, banking records, GST registration, tax returns, and evidence concerning destroyed records were admitted for fresh verification; no addition is to be made if the evidence is discrepancy-free. Tax deduction on purchases is not required twice where the seller has already collected tax at source before the buyer could deduct it. Consequently, disallowance for non-deduction of tax on those purchase payments cannot survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>