<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798820</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the quantum addition forming its sole basis is deleted. The original assessment&#039;s addition for alleged bogus purchases was set aside, and the Assessing Officer accepted the explanation in the fresh assessment and deleted the addition entirely. As the penalty rested exclusively on that addition, its foundation ceased to exist, requiring deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798820</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive where the quantum addition forming its sole basis is deleted. The original assessment&#039;s addition for alleged bogus purchases was set aside, and the Assessing Officer accepted the explanation in the fresh assessment and deleted the addition entirely. As the penalty rested exclusively on that addition, its foundation ceased to exist, requiring deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>