<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 885 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798859</link>
    <description>Bail was directed after the charge-sheet had been filed, as no further custodial interrogation was required. Continued custody for nearly three months, coupled with the absence of stated criminal antecedents, supported release. The petitioner was therefore released on bail pending proceedings, and the special leave petition was disposed of on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 885 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798859</link>
      <description>Bail was directed after the charge-sheet had been filed, as no further custodial interrogation was required. Continued custody for nearly three months, coupled with the absence of stated criminal antecedents, supported release. The petitioner was therefore released on bail pending proceedings, and the special leave petition was disposed of on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>