<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rule 68B limitation preserves timely tax recovery while validating firm-property auction notice, valuation, and bidder payment funding.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103701</link>
    <description>Rule 68B&#039;s amended recovery period applies only where the original limitation period remained alive when the amendment took effect; recovery for 2007-08 and 2008-09 was therefore barred, while proceedings for 2009-10 to 2011-12 remained timely. Service on the defaulting firm sufficed for sale of its assets, particularly where partners received copies and participated; individual notice is required where recovery targets a partner&#039;s personal assets. Auction valuation was not defective because sale prices exceeded guideline and partner-declared market values, and revised reserve prices alone showed no undervaluation. Third-party funding of demand drafts did not invalidate compliant auction payments. The recovery auction was confirmed and the sale certificate was to issue to the purchaser.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 68B limitation preserves timely tax recovery while validating firm-property auction notice, valuation, and bidder payment funding.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103701</link>
      <description>Rule 68B&#039;s amended recovery period applies only where the original limitation period remained alive when the amendment took effect; recovery for 2007-08 and 2008-09 was therefore barred, while proceedings for 2009-10 to 2011-12 remained timely. Service on the defaulting firm sufficed for sale of its assets, particularly where partners received copies and participated; individual notice is required where recovery targets a partner&#039;s personal assets. Auction valuation was not defective because sale prices exceeded guideline and partner-declared market values, and revised reserve prices alone showed no undervaluation. Third-party funding of demand drafts did not invalidate compliant auction payments. The recovery auction was confirmed and the sale certificate was to issue to the purchaser.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>