<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 267 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53759</link>
    <description>Samples drawn within the factory solely for quality control and marketability testing were treated as not liable to excise duty where their use and handling were duly recorded. On that basis, the duty demand on such samples was set aside. The composite penalty, being partly founded on the sample clearances, was reduced, and the penalty on the individual appellant was also set aside. The admitted duty liability on shortage of inputs remained unaffected because it was not in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 267 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53759</link>
      <description>Samples drawn within the factory solely for quality control and marketability testing were treated as not liable to excise duty where their use and handling were duly recorded. On that basis, the duty demand on such samples was set aside. The composite penalty, being partly founded on the sample clearances, was reduced, and the penalty on the individual appellant was also set aside. The admitted duty liability on shortage of inputs remained unaffected because it was not in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>