<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 281 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53757</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the fulfillment of conditions under Notification No. 64/88-Cus for duty exemption, liability to pay duty upon confiscation of goods, calculation of duty on depreciated value versus original import value, and the quantum of redemption fine and personal penalty. The Tribunal held that duty liability arises only upon the exercise of the option to redeem the goods, duty should be calculated on the full CIF value at the time of importation, and confirmed the quantum of redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner. Compliance with exemption notification conditions was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:53:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 281 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53757</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the fulfillment of conditions under Notification No. 64/88-Cus for duty exemption, liability to pay duty upon confiscation of goods, calculation of duty on depreciated value versus original import value, and the quantum of redemption fine and personal penalty. The Tribunal held that duty liability arises only upon the exercise of the option to redeem the goods, duty should be calculated on the full CIF value at the time of importation, and confirmed the quantum of redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner. Compliance with exemption notification conditions was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>