<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 268 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, led by Shri V.K. Jain, Member (T), accepted the Respondent&#039;s argument and rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; continued authority to remand cases post the statutory amendment of Section 128A(3) of the Customs Act, based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 268 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, led by Shri V.K. Jain, Member (T), accepted the Respondent&#039;s argument and rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; continued authority to remand cases post the statutory amendment of Section 128A(3) of the Customs Act, based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>