<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 275 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53746</link>
    <description>A Customs House Agent was found to have breached licensing obligations by allowing another agency to use its name for customs clearances, signing blank documents without knowing the importer or consignment, and failing to ensure authorisation, due diligence, proper document preparation and supervision of employees. On that material, the regulatory violations under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations were proved. The three-year licence suspension and forfeiture of the security deposit were upheld because the misconduct was treated as serious and the penalty was not shown to be manifestly excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 275 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53746</link>
      <description>A Customs House Agent was found to have breached licensing obligations by allowing another agency to use its name for customs clearances, signing blank documents without knowing the importer or consignment, and failing to ensure authorisation, due diligence, proper document preparation and supervision of employees. On that material, the regulatory violations under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations were proved. The three-year licence suspension and forfeiture of the security deposit were upheld because the misconduct was treated as serious and the penalty was not shown to be manifestly excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>