<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 274 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53745</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the confiscation of unaccounted alloy steel flats and rounds, reducing the penalty imposed on the manufacturer from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 2000. The Tribunal found no evidence of intent for clandestine removal, emphasizing that non-accountal in the RG-1 register alone does not justify confiscation without proof of duty evasion. The case outcome was in favor of the manufacturer, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal being rejected based on the lack of sufficient evidence supporting the confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 274 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53745</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the confiscation of unaccounted alloy steel flats and rounds, reducing the penalty imposed on the manufacturer from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 2000. The Tribunal found no evidence of intent for clandestine removal, emphasizing that non-accountal in the RG-1 register alone does not justify confiscation without proof of duty evasion. The case outcome was in favor of the manufacturer, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal being rejected based on the lack of sufficient evidence supporting the confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>