<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</link>
    <description>Confiscation of stock and goods in transit, and the related penalty, were unjustified where a small-scale manufacturer&#039;s clearances remained below the exemption threshold and no duty evasion was alleged or established. Clearance without a proper invoice did not, on these facts, support confiscation or penalty in the absence of revenue evasion. The manufacturer nevertheless remained required to maintain basic production accounts under the applicable trade notice, and non-compliance with that record-keeping requirement could attract proceedings under the relevant rules. Consequential relief followed from setting aside confiscation and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:18:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</link>
      <description>Confiscation of stock and goods in transit, and the related penalty, were unjustified where a small-scale manufacturer&#039;s clearances remained below the exemption threshold and no duty evasion was alleged or established. Clearance without a proper invoice did not, on these facts, support confiscation or penalty in the absence of revenue evasion. The manufacturer nevertheless remained required to maintain basic production accounts under the applicable trade notice, and non-compliance with that record-keeping requirement could attract proceedings under the relevant rules. Consequential relief followed from setting aside confiscation and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>