<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</link>
    <description>Confiscation of stock and goods in transit, and the related penalty, were treated as unwarranted where a small scale unit&#039;s clearances remained below the exemption threshold and there was no allegation or finding of duty evasion. The article notes that clearance without a proper invoice was insufficient, on these facts, to justify confiscatory action or penalty. It also states that the unit remained bound to maintain basic production accounts under the trade notice, and that non-compliance with that record-keeping requirement could still be proceeded against under the applicable rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:18:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</link>
      <description>Confiscation of stock and goods in transit, and the related penalty, were treated as unwarranted where a small scale unit&#039;s clearances remained below the exemption threshold and there was no allegation or finding of duty evasion. The article notes that clearance without a proper invoice was insufficient, on these facts, to justify confiscatory action or penalty. It also states that the unit remained bound to maintain basic production accounts under the trade notice, and that non-compliance with that record-keeping requirement could still be proceeded against under the applicable rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>