<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 799 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798773</link>
    <description>Omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, without a saving or sunset clause, ended the rule&#039;s restriction on refund of integrated tax paid on exports, including pending refund claims. A show-cause notice issued after the omission took effect could not rely on the omitted restriction. The resulting position is that the restriction under Rule 96(10) was unavailable against the exporter, and the notice and consequential order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:52:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 799 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798773</link>
      <description>Omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, without a saving or sunset clause, ended the rule&#039;s restriction on refund of integrated tax paid on exports, including pending refund claims. A show-cause notice issued after the omission took effect could not rely on the omitted restriction. The resulting position is that the restriction under Rule 96(10) was unavailable against the exporter, and the notice and consequential order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>