<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 250 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals in both cases, emphasizing that the rejected goods were processed further before being cleared as scrap, and duty was paid on the scrap based on its value. The Tribunal found that the assessee was not required to reverse the credit taken when the rejected goods were received back into the factory, as the rejected wire was indeed subjected to further processing before being cleared as scrap. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s claim that the assessee should have debited an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of scrap clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 250 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals in both cases, emphasizing that the rejected goods were processed further before being cleared as scrap, and duty was paid on the scrap based on its value. The Tribunal found that the assessee was not required to reverse the credit taken when the rejected goods were received back into the factory, as the rejected wire was indeed subjected to further processing before being cleared as scrap. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s claim that the assessee should have debited an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of scrap clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>