<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 749 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798723</link>
    <description>Before 3 June 2016, the RNI-registration requirement for newsprint applied at clearance rather than import; its later extension to imports of warehoused goods operated prospectively. Serial No. 264 of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. granted newsprint exemption without an RNI-registration or Actual User condition. For newsprint not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, the Department bore the initial burden of proving unlawful import, diversion, or clearance through dummy users. Without cogent evidence of excess goods, local-market diversion, illicit consideration, or dummy users, serial-number discrepancies alone could not sustain confiscation or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 749 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798723</link>
      <description>Before 3 June 2016, the RNI-registration requirement for newsprint applied at clearance rather than import; its later extension to imports of warehoused goods operated prospectively. Serial No. 264 of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. granted newsprint exemption without an RNI-registration or Actual User condition. For newsprint not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, the Department bore the initial burden of proving unlawful import, diversion, or clearance through dummy users. Without cogent evidence of excess goods, local-market diversion, illicit consideration, or dummy users, serial-number discrepancies alone could not sustain confiscation or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>