<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 264 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53734</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was upheld where it followed closely after Orders-in-Original imposing substantial penalties, satisfying the requirement of immediate action under the applicable suspension regulation in the changed factual context. The earlier ruling setting aside suspension was distinguished because it turned on different facts. Since a show cause notice had already been issued, the adjudication was allowed to continue, but the proceedings had to be completed expeditiously to avoid unnecessary disruption of business. The Commissioner was directed to finish the pending proceedings within four months, failing which the suspension would stand set aside under the cited Larger Bench principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 264 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53734</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was upheld where it followed closely after Orders-in-Original imposing substantial penalties, satisfying the requirement of immediate action under the applicable suspension regulation in the changed factual context. The earlier ruling setting aside suspension was distinguished because it turned on different facts. Since a show cause notice had already been issued, the adjudication was allowed to continue, but the proceedings had to be completed expeditiously to avoid unnecessary disruption of business. The Commissioner was directed to finish the pending proceedings within four months, failing which the suspension would stand set aside under the cited Larger Bench principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>