<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 257 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53727</link>
    <description>The appellants were granted Modvat credit despite presenting certified photocopies of lost invoices, as the duty paid nature of the capital goods was acknowledged and not disputed by the Department. Citing relevant legal precedents, the court allowed the credit based on the certified photocopies, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The appellants were deemed entitled to avail the Modvat credit of the disputed amount, and their appeal was allowed with any consequential relief permissible under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 257 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53727</link>
      <description>The appellants were granted Modvat credit despite presenting certified photocopies of lost invoices, as the duty paid nature of the capital goods was acknowledged and not disputed by the Department. Citing relevant legal precedents, the court allowed the credit based on the certified photocopies, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The appellants were deemed entitled to avail the Modvat credit of the disputed amount, and their appeal was allowed with any consequential relief permissible under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>