<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1084 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471605</link>
    <description>Exemption from the suitability test for Graduate Typists and Confidential Assistants dispensed only with the qualifying-test requirement; it did not grant preferential promotion rights as Section Officers. The exemption expressly preserved the claims of eligible non-graduate candidates who had passed the test and awaited appointment. A later clarificatory order could not enlarge the original exemption into a continuing graduate preference after its effective date. Eligible non-graduates who satisfied the test requirement therefore retained their claims to appointment and consequential service benefits without being subordinated to exempt graduate candidates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1084 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471605</link>
      <description>Exemption from the suitability test for Graduate Typists and Confidential Assistants dispensed only with the qualifying-test requirement; it did not grant preferential promotion rights as Section Officers. The exemption expressly preserved the claims of eligible non-graduate candidates who had passed the test and awaited appointment. A later clarificatory order could not enlarge the original exemption into a continuing graduate preference after its effective date. Eligible non-graduates who satisfied the test requirement therefore retained their claims to appointment and consequential service benefits without being subordinated to exempt graduate candidates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>