<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1469 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471597</link>
    <description>Where the Tribunal follows binding High Court precedent and identical Revenue appeals have already been dismissed, no substantial question of law arises unless contrary material distinguishes or displaces the settled position. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed because it identified no basis to depart from the governing precedent, and the issue remained decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1469 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471597</link>
      <description>Where the Tribunal follows binding High Court precedent and identical Revenue appeals have already been dismissed, no substantial question of law arises unless contrary material distinguishes or displaces the settled position. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed because it identified no basis to depart from the governing precedent, and the issue remained decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>