<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 251 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53718</link>
    <description>Show cause notices were treated as invalid where they failed to quantify the duty demand, because a demand notice must indicate the amount sought to be recovered. Demand was also held unsustainable retrospectively where approved price lists were not revised and later debit notes were alleged as flow-back. Duty could not be confirmed under omitted Rule 10A, as Section 38A saved only specified categories and did not revive proceedings under an omitted rule. The demand and penalty were set aside, granting relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 251 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53718</link>
      <description>Show cause notices were treated as invalid where they failed to quantify the duty demand, because a demand notice must indicate the amount sought to be recovered. Demand was also held unsustainable retrospectively where approved price lists were not revised and later debit notes were alleged as flow-back. Duty could not be confirmed under omitted Rule 10A, as Section 38A saved only specified categories and did not revive proceedings under an omitted rule. The demand and penalty were set aside, granting relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>