<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 654 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798628</link>
    <description>Mutatis mutandis incorporation of customs-notification conditions into the International Competitive Bidding excise exemption extends only to conditions capable of operating for domestic clearances. Import-specific procedural requirements cannot be imposed mechanically on indigenous manufacturers where the eligible project, actual end use and Project Authority Certificate are undisputed; substantive exemption eligibility therefore remains intact. A duty demand founded solely on exemption denial cannot survive, and payment under protest does not validate it. Interest requires a legally recoverable principal duty liability. Penalties are not attracted where clearances followed prior intimation and certificate production, with no suppression or clandestine removal and only an interpretational dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 654 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798628</link>
      <description>Mutatis mutandis incorporation of customs-notification conditions into the International Competitive Bidding excise exemption extends only to conditions capable of operating for domestic clearances. Import-specific procedural requirements cannot be imposed mechanically on indigenous manufacturers where the eligible project, actual end use and Project Authority Certificate are undisputed; substantive exemption eligibility therefore remains intact. A duty demand founded solely on exemption denial cannot survive, and payment under protest does not validate it. Interest requires a legally recoverable principal duty liability. Penalties are not attracted where clearances followed prior intimation and certificate production, with no suppression or clandestine removal and only an interpretational dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>