<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 260 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53709</link>
    <description>Eligibility for concessional excise exemption turned on whether the cement plant&#039;s installed capacity was certified by the prescribed competent authority and remained within the notified limit. The competent authority&#039;s certificate recorded installed capacity at 1,94,040 tonnes per annum, which was below the 1,98,000-tonne threshold in the notifications. That statutory certificate governed entitlement, and contrary revenue material did not displace it. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the duty demand based on that denial failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:00:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 260 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53709</link>
      <description>Eligibility for concessional excise exemption turned on whether the cement plant&#039;s installed capacity was certified by the prescribed competent authority and remained within the notified limit. The competent authority&#039;s certificate recorded installed capacity at 1,94,040 tonnes per annum, which was below the 1,98,000-tonne threshold in the notifications. That statutory certificate governed entitlement, and contrary revenue material did not displace it. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the duty demand based on that denial failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>