<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 257 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and the appeal, as a fresh appeal against the same impugned order was not maintainable after the original appeal was disposed of. The lack of authorization and readability issues in the original appeal and restoration application further contributed to the dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the finality of its earlier order and the necessity of adhering to proper procedures in filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 257 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and the appeal, as a fresh appeal against the same impugned order was not maintainable after the original appeal was disposed of. The lack of authorization and readability issues in the original appeal and restoration application further contributed to the dismissal. The Tribunal emphasized the finality of its earlier order and the necessity of adhering to proper procedures in filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>