<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 305 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53701</link>
    <description>A bona fide clerical correction in excise account records by a contra entry in the PLA was treated as a permissible rectification, and it could not be refused merely because it was not supported by a TR-6 challan payment. The text further states that limitation under refund provisions was inapplicable because the amount reversed under the Modvat/Cenvat scheme was not duty, and no prior departmental permission was required to correct the accounting mistake. It also emphasises that a demand cannot rest on a ground not set out in the show cause notice, and that penalty would not be warranted where the corrective entry was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 305 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53701</link>
      <description>A bona fide clerical correction in excise account records by a contra entry in the PLA was treated as a permissible rectification, and it could not be refused merely because it was not supported by a TR-6 challan payment. The text further states that limitation under refund provisions was inapplicable because the amount reversed under the Modvat/Cenvat scheme was not duty, and no prior departmental permission was required to correct the accounting mistake. It also emphasises that a demand cannot rest on a ground not set out in the show cause notice, and that penalty would not be warranted where the corrective entry was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>