<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1517 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471558</link>
    <description>Resolution-plan approval under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is confined to verifying compliance with the statutory conditions in Sections 30(2) and 31 after approval by the requisite Committee of Creditors voting share. The plan addressed insolvency-resolution costs, operational-creditor payments, post-approval management, implementation and supervision, and met the applicable requirements of Regulations 37, 38 and 39(4) of the Insolvency Resolution Process Regulations. Communication of the approval order to group-company stakeholders did not make implementation conditional on approval of their separate resolution plans. The plan was therefore treated as compliant and approved under Section 31(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 11:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1517 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471558</link>
      <description>Resolution-plan approval under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is confined to verifying compliance with the statutory conditions in Sections 30(2) and 31 after approval by the requisite Committee of Creditors voting share. The plan addressed insolvency-resolution costs, operational-creditor payments, post-approval management, implementation and supervision, and met the applicable requirements of Regulations 37, 38 and 39(4) of the Insolvency Resolution Process Regulations. Communication of the approval order to group-company stakeholders did not make implementation conditional on approval of their separate resolution plans. The plan was therefore treated as compliant and approved under Section 31(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>