<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 567 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798541</link>
    <description>Pre-import condition breaches attract IGST only for imports shown, through bill-of-entry-wise and raw-material-wise import-export correlation, to have preceded the corresponding exports. Subsequent discharge of export obligations or export-obligation-discharge certificates does not itself preserve unconditional IGST exemption where an actual breach is established; the liability must be regularised under the applicable procedure. Authorisation-wise quantification is insufficient, particularly where valid clubbing of advance authorisations must be given effect. Interest, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty require substantive statutory authority and are not sustainable for the described IGST regularisation during the relevant period, especially where authorisation particulars were disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 567 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798541</link>
      <description>Pre-import condition breaches attract IGST only for imports shown, through bill-of-entry-wise and raw-material-wise import-export correlation, to have preceded the corresponding exports. Subsequent discharge of export obligations or export-obligation-discharge certificates does not itself preserve unconditional IGST exemption where an actual breach is established; the liability must be regularised under the applicable procedure. Authorisation-wise quantification is insufficient, particularly where valid clubbing of advance authorisations must be given effect. Interest, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty require substantive statutory authority and are not sustainable for the described IGST regularisation during the relevant period, especially where authorisation particulars were disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>