<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 576 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798550</link>
    <description>Appellate Authority must decide the customs dispute independently on its own merits and without being influenced by prior judicial observations. The impugned order remained undisturbed, while the special leave petition was disposed of subject to that clarification. Pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of. This preserves an uninfluenced merits determination at the appellate stage despite non-interference with the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 576 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798550</link>
      <description>Appellate Authority must decide the customs dispute independently on its own merits and without being influenced by prior judicial observations. The impugned order remained undisturbed, while the special leave petition was disposed of subject to that clarification. Pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of. This preserves an uninfluenced merits determination at the appellate stage despite non-interference with the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>