<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 638 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798612</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings under Section 129(3) require consideration of relevant ownership material produced by the person claiming detained goods. Where an e-way bill, tax invoice and bilty were produced but not considered, the penalty order could not be sustained. The authority must also address the matter covered by serial No. 6 of Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST. The penalty order was set aside for fresh consideration of the ownership documents in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 638 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798612</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings under Section 129(3) require consideration of relevant ownership material produced by the person claiming detained goods. Where an e-way bill, tax invoice and bilty were produced but not considered, the penalty order could not be sustained. The authority must also address the matter covered by serial No. 6 of Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST. The penalty order was set aside for fresh consideration of the ownership documents in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>