<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals due to the lack of valid grounds for enhancing the value of imported goods, failure to follow proper procedures in rejecting transaction values, and absence of evidence supporting the international price-based assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to Valuation Rules and providing clear justifications for assessment decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:05:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals due to the lack of valid grounds for enhancing the value of imported goods, failure to follow proper procedures in rejecting transaction values, and absence of evidence supporting the international price-based assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to Valuation Rules and providing clear justifications for assessment decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>