<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 239 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53680</link>
    <description>A customs exemption clarification was treated as retrospective where it merely made explicit an existing eligibility condition under the original notification, so the importer qualified for exemption on six Bills of Entry. The same clarification was not read into a separate exemption notification that did not contain that condition, so the goods covered by two other Bills of Entry did not qualify for relief. The text applies the principle that a clarificatory notification operates retrospectively only within the scope of the notification it explains, and cannot enlarge a distinct exemption provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 239 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53680</link>
      <description>A customs exemption clarification was treated as retrospective where it merely made explicit an existing eligibility condition under the original notification, so the importer qualified for exemption on six Bills of Entry. The same clarification was not read into a separate exemption notification that did not contain that condition, so the goods covered by two other Bills of Entry did not qualify for relief. The text applies the principle that a clarificatory notification operates retrospectively only within the scope of the notification it explains, and cannot enlarge a distinct exemption provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>