<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Continuing default and debt acknowledgment preserved limitation for the insolvency application after the revival scheme failed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103539</link>
    <description>Continuing failure to deliver possession of an allotted unit or refund amounts received constituted a continuing default, creating a continuing cause of action for a financial creditor&#039;s insolvency application. Inclusion of the creditor&#039;s claim in a settlement scheme operated as an acknowledgment of debt, preventing the claim from being treated as time-barred. The application therefore remained within limitation. Once the revival scheme was declared unworkable and parties were permitted to revive insolvency proceedings, objections based on the scheme&#039;s subsistence and parallel proceedings no longer survived. The corporate debtor&#039;s admission into insolvency consequently remained effective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Continuing default and debt acknowledgment preserved limitation for the insolvency application after the revival scheme failed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103539</link>
      <description>Continuing failure to deliver possession of an allotted unit or refund amounts received constituted a continuing default, creating a continuing cause of action for a financial creditor&#039;s insolvency application. Inclusion of the creditor&#039;s claim in a settlement scheme operated as an acknowledgment of debt, preventing the claim from being treated as time-barred. The application therefore remained within limitation. Once the revival scheme was declared unworkable and parties were permitted to revive insolvency proceedings, objections based on the scheme&#039;s subsistence and parallel proceedings no longer survived. The corporate debtor&#039;s admission into insolvency consequently remained effective.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>