<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 233 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding no breach of Customs Notifications conditions by the appellants. It held that the JDGFT&#039;s order, confirming the discharge of export obligations, was final and binding. Consequently, the demands for duty, interest, confiscation, fines, and penalties were invalidated. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 233 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding no breach of Customs Notifications conditions by the appellants. It held that the JDGFT&#039;s order, confirming the discharge of export obligations, was final and binding. Consequently, the demands for duty, interest, confiscation, fines, and penalties were invalidated. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>