<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sole Proprietorship Liability: Cheque-dishonour complaints may proceed against proprietors without separately arraigning their trade concerns.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103527</link>
    <description>Separate arraignment of a sole proprietary concern is unnecessary for a cheque-dishonour complaint against its proprietor. Statutory vicarious criminal liability applies where the drawer is a juristic entity distinct from the individuals sought to be held responsible for its affairs. A sole proprietorship has no legal existence separate from its proprietor; use of a trade name or maintenance of a bank account in that name does not create a separate legal person. Accordingly, proceedings may continue against the proprietor in that capacity without impleading the proprietary concern separately, while questions concerning the underlying liability and defences remain for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sole Proprietorship Liability: Cheque-dishonour complaints may proceed against proprietors without separately arraigning their trade concerns.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103527</link>
      <description>Separate arraignment of a sole proprietary concern is unnecessary for a cheque-dishonour complaint against its proprietor. Statutory vicarious criminal liability applies where the drawer is a juristic entity distinct from the individuals sought to be held responsible for its affairs. A sole proprietorship has no legal existence separate from its proprietor; use of a trade name or maintenance of a bank account in that name does not create a separate legal person. Accordingly, proceedings may continue against the proprietor in that capacity without impleading the proprietary concern separately, while questions concerning the underlying liability and defences remain for trial.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:20:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>