<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471535</link>
    <description>SARFAESI enforcement under Section 13 is confined to a secured creditor enforcing security against a borrower whose financial assistance originated from a bank or financial institution. The statutory definitions of borrower, financial assistance, secured creditor and security interest do not extend this recovery mechanism to debts originally advanced by a non-banking financial company. Acquisition of such debt and its security by a bank, although potentially permissible as a banking activity, does not alter the debt&#039;s origin or expand the statutory borrower class. A bank therefore cannot invoke Section 13 to enforce security assigned by a non-banking financial company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471535</link>
      <description>SARFAESI enforcement under Section 13 is confined to a secured creditor enforcing security against a borrower whose financial assistance originated from a bank or financial institution. The statutory definitions of borrower, financial assistance, secured creditor and security interest do not extend this recovery mechanism to debts originally advanced by a non-banking financial company. Acquisition of such debt and its security by a bank, although potentially permissible as a banking activity, does not alter the debt&#039;s origin or expand the statutory borrower class. A bank therefore cannot invoke Section 13 to enforce security assigned by a non-banking financial company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>