<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 225 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53666</link>
    <description>Goods removed clandestinely without payment of duty remained liable to confiscation and redemption fine because the invoices were found to camouflage removal and the excess stock was admitted as unaccounted. Provisional release of the goods did not bar imposition of redemption fine where confiscation was otherwise justified. The penalty was also sustained because the non-payment of duty was treated as intentional clandestine removal, and duty was paid only after detection by officers. The commentary thus states that deliberate evasion supports both confiscation-related consequences and penal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 225 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53666</link>
      <description>Goods removed clandestinely without payment of duty remained liable to confiscation and redemption fine because the invoices were found to camouflage removal and the excess stock was admitted as unaccounted. Provisional release of the goods did not bar imposition of redemption fine where confiscation was otherwise justified. The penalty was also sustained because the non-payment of duty was treated as intentional clandestine removal, and duty was paid only after detection by officers. The commentary thus states that deliberate evasion supports both confiscation-related consequences and penal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>