<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798458</link>
    <description>Extended assessment jurisdiction under the fourth proviso to Section 153A requires material showing that escaped income is represented by an identifiable asset specified in Explanation 2, together with the Assessing Officer&#039;s objective and independent recorded satisfaction. Loose papers alleging cash payments for land, without identifying or establishing acquisition of immovable property or another specified asset, do not satisfy these conditions. Material potentially supporting an unexplained-investment addition cannot replace the separate jurisdictional basis for extending the search-assessment period. Subsequent merits enquiries cannot cure an invalid notice; notices and consequential assessments issued without the required foundation are without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798458</link>
      <description>Extended assessment jurisdiction under the fourth proviso to Section 153A requires material showing that escaped income is represented by an identifiable asset specified in Explanation 2, together with the Assessing Officer&#039;s objective and independent recorded satisfaction. Loose papers alleging cash payments for land, without identifying or establishing acquisition of immovable property or another specified asset, do not satisfy these conditions. Material potentially supporting an unexplained-investment addition cannot replace the separate jurisdictional basis for extending the search-assessment period. Subsequent merits enquiries cannot cure an invalid notice; notices and consequential assessments issued without the required foundation are without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>