<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798473</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest from a Regional Rural Bank had been specifically examined and allowed after inquiry, following jurisdictional High Court precedent treating a Regional Rural Bank as a co-operative society through the statutory deeming fiction in the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. Section 80P(4) did not displace that precedent. A later contrary coordinate-bench view could neither retrospectively make the assessment erroneous nor override binding High Court authority. Explanation 2 to section 263 did not apply because there was no lack of inquiry; consequently, revision was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798473</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest from a Regional Rural Bank had been specifically examined and allowed after inquiry, following jurisdictional High Court precedent treating a Regional Rural Bank as a co-operative society through the statutory deeming fiction in the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. Section 80P(4) did not displace that precedent. A later contrary coordinate-bench view could neither retrospectively make the assessment erroneous nor override binding High Court authority. Explanation 2 to section 263 did not apply because there was no lack of inquiry; consequently, revision was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>