<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 503 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798477</link>
    <description>For pre-amendment assessment years, capital gains invested within the prescribed period in more than one residential unit could qualify for residential-property relief. The expression &quot;a residential house&quot; was capable of covering multiple units before the statutory restriction to one residential house took effect from 1 April 2015; that restriction operates prospectively and cannot alone deny relief for earlier years. A reopening challenge based on the absence of a separate speaking order on objections does not arise where the communication contains only factual statements rather than specific, substantive objections to the recorded reopening reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 503 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798477</link>
      <description>For pre-amendment assessment years, capital gains invested within the prescribed period in more than one residential unit could qualify for residential-property relief. The expression &quot;a residential house&quot; was capable of covering multiple units before the statutory restriction to one residential house took effect from 1 April 2015; that restriction operates prospectively and cannot alone deny relief for earlier years. A reopening challenge based on the absence of a separate speaking order on objections does not arise where the communication contains only factual statements rather than specific, substantive objections to the recorded reopening reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>