<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. It was concluded that the declared value of the imported goods should not have been enhanced based on the comparison with goods imported by another entity, as they were found not comparable due to differences in origin, timing, and quantities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. It was concluded that the declared value of the imported goods should not have been enhanced based on the comparison with goods imported by another entity, as they were found not comparable due to differences in origin, timing, and quantities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>