<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1674 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471495</link>
    <description>Clause 15 of the Letters Patent permits an intra-court appeal from an interlocutory order only where the order has finality, directly affects a vital right, or conclusively determines a material controversy. An order granting time to file an affidavit-in-opposition, deferring consideration of ad-interim relief, and requiring sales accounts does not conclusively determine entitlement to an injunction, particularly where prima facie observations are non-binding. Appellate review of discretionary interim relief is limited to arbitrariness, perversity, caprice, or departure from settled injunction principles. It cannot replace the Single Judge&#039;s initial assessment of balance of convenience and irreparable injury.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1674 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471495</link>
      <description>Clause 15 of the Letters Patent permits an intra-court appeal from an interlocutory order only where the order has finality, directly affects a vital right, or conclusively determines a material controversy. An order granting time to file an affidavit-in-opposition, deferring consideration of ad-interim relief, and requiring sales accounts does not conclusively determine entitlement to an injunction, particularly where prima facie observations are non-binding. Appellate review of discretionary interim relief is limited to arbitrariness, perversity, caprice, or departure from settled injunction principles. It cannot replace the Single Judge&#039;s initial assessment of balance of convenience and irreparable injury.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>