https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798407 Execution of a registered joint development agreement, coupled with authority for the developer to undertake construction and obtain approvals, did not constitute a transfer under the capital-gains provisions read with the part-performance rule. The owner was entitled to receive her share only after construction, and construction-related access did not itself transfer the property. As the agreement related to an earlier financial year, no long-term capital gain arose in the assessment year in which the addition was made; the capital-gains addition was deleted. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798407 Execution of a registered joint development agreement, coupled with authority for the developer to undertake construction and obtain approvals, did not constitute a transfer under the capital-gains provisions read with the part-performance rule. The owner was entitled to receive her share only after construction, and construction-related access did not itself transfer the property. As the agreement related to an earlier financial year, no long-term capital gain arose in the assessment year in which the addition was made; the capital-gains addition was deleted. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798407