<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798433</link>
    <description>Expiry of the extended six-month period under Section 67(7) causes a prohibition order over goods to cease automatically. Detention of goods based on an expired prohibition order exceeds the statutory time limit and is unlawful. Where the prescribed maximum period has lapsed, the goods must be released to the assessee rather than remain subject to continued detention or prohibition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798433</link>
      <description>Expiry of the extended six-month period under Section 67(7) causes a prohibition order over goods to cease automatically. Detention of goods based on an expired prohibition order exceeds the statutory time limit and is unlawful. Where the prescribed maximum period has lapsed, the goods must be released to the assessee rather than remain subject to continued detention or prohibition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>