<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT territorial jurisdiction follows the Assessing Officer&#039;s location, requiring appeals and cross-objections only before the appropriate Bench.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103471</link>
    <description>ITAT ordinary territorial jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Assessing Officer who issued the assessment order, rather than the assessee&#039;s location or that of the Commissioner (Appeals). The President&#039;s procedural rule-making power does not extend to transferring a pending appeal between Benches situated in different States. Where the assessment order originated from an Assessing Officer at Chennai, the Mumbai Bench lacked jurisdiction over both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s related cross-objection. Both were dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction, with liberty to approach the appropriate Bench; merits remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT territorial jurisdiction follows the Assessing Officer&#039;s location, requiring appeals and cross-objections only before the appropriate Bench.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103471</link>
      <description>ITAT ordinary territorial jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Assessing Officer who issued the assessment order, rather than the assessee&#039;s location or that of the Commissioner (Appeals). The President&#039;s procedural rule-making power does not extend to transferring a pending appeal between Benches situated in different States. Where the assessment order originated from an Assessing Officer at Chennai, the Mumbai Bench lacked jurisdiction over both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s related cross-objection. Both were dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction, with liberty to approach the appropriate Bench; merits remained open.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>