https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103450 Fair-hearing requirements require supply of documents relied on in pleadings where the retention order is founded on them; service of a panchnama alone does not provide an adequate opportunity to respond. Retention of seized documents is justified only when they are relied on in a prosecution complaint or supplementary complaint and required to prove the case against an accused. Documents not so required must be released within a reasonable time, while authenticated photocopies may be retained. The retention direction was consequently limited to documents necessary as prosecution evidence. en-us Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:57 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103450 Fair-hearing requirements require supply of documents relied on in pleadings where the retention order is founded on them; service of a panchnama alone does not provide an adequate opportunity to respond. Retention of seized documents is justified only when they are relied on in a prosecution complaint or supplementary complaint and required to prove the case against an accused. Documents not so required must be released within a reasonable time, while authenticated photocopies may be retained. The retention direction was consequently limited to documents necessary as prosecution evidence. Highlights Money Laundering Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:48:57 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103450