<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1862 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471493</link>
    <description>Pending appellate review of a confiscation order, merits were not adjudicated after the appeal had been transmitted to the Commissioner of Appeals. Expedited consideration of the appeal was directed, together with service of the appeal on the petitioner. Status quo over the detained gold bar was required to be maintained until the appeal is decided, preserving the subject matter of the confiscation dispute during appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 09:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1862 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471493</link>
      <description>Pending appellate review of a confiscation order, merits were not adjudicated after the appeal had been transmitted to the Commissioner of Appeals. Expedited consideration of the appeal was directed, together with service of the appeal on the petitioner. Status quo over the detained gold bar was required to be maintained until the appeal is decided, preserving the subject matter of the confiscation dispute during appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>